The joy and problems with iCloud Photo library

The first digital picture I have in posession was taken on January 1st 2001 with a FujiFilm FinePix6800 ZOOM. It had a resolution of 3 megapixels and weighed 360 kilobytes.

Behold!
Yes, my first digital image was of a wooden copy of the TinTin moon rocket.

Since then, I have shot my way through 15 years of life with a small array of cameras, totally adding up to around 160.000 images of different size and quality. Many of them tagged, named and managed with the now defunct (alas!) Aperture.

Consistency hell

Up until recently, I had an unhealthy, unhinged Lightroom library (I never managed to get that program into my fingertips or workflow), an offline Photos library converted from Aperture, and an online Photos library consisting mainly of iPhone pics.

But then I bought a Sony RX-100III as a travel camera, and started transferring pictures to my iPhone via WiFi while on the go. When back at my computer, I imported the remaining pics from because it was easier to manage everything from one location. I also decided to copy some of my more memorable albums from Aperture, as trips and places often pop up in conversations, and that it’s cool to be able to say “Check this out”

So over just a couple of months, inconsistency and redundancy issues arose. Having librarian tendencies, and having tried (and hated) the Adobe / Lightroom cloud, I decided I would — once again — make the leap of faith with Apple. This time more so because of the completely nonsensical Adobe Cloud1 than Apples solution being best. So I started moving all of the photos into the iCloud Photo library.

Enter Magic

My Aperture library alone held over 120.000 images and ticked in at about 800Gb. It was harder than I imagined to get them all into the same library2. Also – with only a 15MB/s uplink it literally took weeks to upload all the data. But little by little, all of my pixelated history — from the wooden rocket image from 2001 until yesterdays street shoot started popping up on all my devices.

And this actually felt just like the kind of “magic” Apple sometimes overuse in their presentations. While this is really easy to understand as a concept, it is hard to explain how incredibly transparent and nice it is when it “just works”. Not only did I now have I access to every photo and video I ever took at an instant (tags and albums help a lot while searching DSLR/P&S pics without GPS), but I was also still be able to shoot images and hours of HD video without ever running out of space.

Seriously — using Dropbox or Google Photos to “empty” your phone for photos from time to time doesn’t even come close, at least not on an iPhone. With iCloud Photo Library, it’s all there and not there at the same time. I could now browse, watch, edit and upload the RAW photo from the Canon 5D 50mm@1.4f image I took in 2012 with nearly as much ease as the one that was taken seconds ago.

In addition to instant access to over a terabyte of images and videos, I always have ±16Gb free space on my iPhone. This really feels magical. Although the transition had a lot was lost moving from Aperture and Photos is lacking several important features — moving my images to iCloud is one of the best “digital decisions” I have made. If that is a thing.

But as the library grew bigger, weird stuff started happening. Or rather — stuff stopped from happening at all.

Exit Magic

I first met the problem with my present go-to photo editor Polarr, that just wouldn’t load at all. I tried reinstalling, but while I could get into the tutorials fine, it wouldn’t let me load any images without crashing. And yet — although the app itself crashed on launch every time, its extension for Photos.app worked just fine.

But why?

Read More

Skype now sucks a little less, but only on mobile

Skype for iOS is now apparently five times faster than the current app. It also looks about three times better, and that’s great. Even if FaceTime and Hangout has taken over for most of my video conferencing needs, Skyping is still the Xerox of video conferencing (my mom still refers to FaceTime as Skyping so there you have it), and everyone has it. Yet no one is online on it. You might have a different experience, but most of my Skype calls often starts with a phone call, SMS or mail.

Skype 2014 06 09 kl 22 05 01I might be reaching here, but it could have something to do with the desktop interface. Skype is hands down one of the most cluttered, noisy and clumsy 2000s app interfaces on my Mac, seemingly lacking any direction of what it’s there for and where it’s going (Microsoft acquisitions rarely do).

Clutter

Judging just by the main interface – what does this app do? …If you have never used it before, what would you use this app for? Even if you know it has something to do with video conferencing, the design gives no clue of this. Instead, the default screen prompts you to connect to Facebook… to – I guess – update… your Skype status – on Facebook?

The rest of the interface is a mess of small and big buttons, super tiny and enormous typography, and of course the aforementioned noisy social media integration. It’s also impossible to make the window smaller – my main gripe of even having the app open. (I researched this, and tried downloading the Skype Business Edition as some discussion forums suggested this would do away with the social media nagging window, but alas – it’s PC only.)

I won’t go into any more detail, let’s just say that the desktop version of Skype doesn’t feel like the home of the worlds largest video conferencing app, accounting for 70 million+ video conferences per day (numbers from 2013). My first tip would be to do away with the 2000s and start over with a clean slate and a focus of core services. 2003 is 11 years ago these days, and people are starting to notice.

Apple’s new Lightning spec allows for smarter, better-sounding…

20140609-012340-5020267.jpg

Sources for 9to5 Mac understand that Apple has published a new specification that lets headphone makers use an iOS device’s Lightning port for audio instead of the normal 3.5mm jack. On a basic level, this allows headsets to launch apps and carry more than just the usual playback controls. However, there’s reportedly an advanced spec that permits a lot more — headphones could include digital-to-analog converters and other processing that overrides what’s in the device. If you’re not happy with the fidelity of the built-in hardware, a new pair of cans could provide an upgrade.

…and – one might think – really awesome audio peripherals.